doPhysics.in
All chapters

Conservative and Non-Conservative Forces

14 min read3 ideas5 checks2 figures to playBy Asheshanand Acharya
What you will learn 0 / 3
The path test for a conservative force
Look around
Two trails to the same hilltop

Two friends climb from the same village to the same temple on a hilltop near Dharamshala. One takes the short, steep trail. The other takes the long trail that winds gently around the hill. Both reach the temple with the same weight on their backs. The one on the long trail is more tired, but is that because of gravity?

you will see why gravity charges both trekkers exactly the same, while the air and the ground charge the one on the long trail more.

The path test

Carry a body from a point A to a point B along some path. A force acting on it does some work \(W_{AB}\) along the way. Now carry it from A to B along a different path. For some forces the work is the same on every path. It depends only on where the body starts and where it ends. Such a force is a conservative force.

Gravity near the Earth is the standard example. Its work is \(-mg\,\Delta h\), where \(\Delta h\) is the rise in height. A steep path and a gentle path between the same two points have the same \(\Delta h\). So gravity does the same work on both. The spring force is another example: its work depends only on the stretch at the start and at the end.

Gravity and drag on different routes from A to BA 1 kilogram body is moved at a steady speed from A to B, 4 metres across and 3 metres up, against gravity and a drag of constant size 2 newtons. Chips choose a straight route, a route along then up, a route up, across and down, and a round trip to B and back. At B the work of gravity is minus 30 joules on every route and zero after the round trip, while the work of the drag is minus 10, minus 14, minus 22 and minus 20 joules: it grows with the length of the route. A B distance 0.0 m gravity: W = 0 J drag: W = 0 J
Fig 2.1A \(1\,\text{kg}\) body is moved at a steady speed from A to B, \(4\,\text{m}\) across and \(3\,\text{m}\) up. A drag of constant size \(2\,\text{N}\) opposes it. Choose a route and press play. At B gravity's work is \(-30\,\text{J}\) on every route. The drag's work is \(-10\), \(-14\) and \(-22\,\text{J}\): it grows with the length of the route.

Play the route "up, across, down" in Fig 2.1 and watch the gravity readout. It falls to \(-50\,\text{J}\) at the top of the climb. On the way down it rises again to \(-30\,\text{J}\). Gravity returns on the descent the extra it took on the climb. The drag readout only ever falls, by \(2\,\text{J}\) for every metre moved.

The round-trip test

Now choose "to B and back". The body ends where it started, so the path is a closed loop. Gravity's work over the round trip is zero: it took \(30\,\text{J}\) on the way up and returned \(30\,\text{J}\) on the way down. The drag took \(10\,\text{J}\) on each leg, \(20\,\text{J}\) in all. It returned nothing.

definition 2.2
Conservative force

A force is conservative if the work it does on a body moving between any two points is the same for every path joining them. Equivalently, the work it does around every closed path is zero.

The two tests always agree. Suppose the work from A to B is the same on path 1 and on path 2. Go out along path 1 and return along path 2. The return trip reverses every displacement, so its work is the negative of the work along path 2. The round trip then gives \(W_1 - W_2 = 0\). Read backwards, a zero round trip forces \(W_1 = W_2\).

Checkpoint · numericUnanswered

A \(3\,\text{kg}\) box is pushed up a \(10\,\text{m}\) long ramp onto a platform \(4\,\text{m}\) high. Take \(g = 10\,\text{m/s}^2\). What is the work done by gravity on the box, in joules?

J± 2 %
CheckpointUnanswered

A box is dragged across a rough floor from the door to a cupboard and then back to the door. What is the total work done on it by gravity, and by kinetic friction?

Only a conservative force has a potential energy

Why the test decides everything

A potential energy \(U\) is a single number attached to each point. Between two points its change \(U_B - U_A\) has one value. Lesson 1 set that change equal to \(-W_{AB}\). This is possible only if \(W_{AB}\) also has one value, the same on every path. So a force can have a potential energy only if it is conservative.

A force that fails the test is a non-conservative force. Kinetic friction always opposes the sliding, so it takes energy on every metre in every direction. Air drag does the same. A longer route costs more, and no number attached to the points could track that. So friction and drag have no potential energy. Their work must be written out in full in every calculation.

Property
Conservative force
Non-conservative force
Work from A to B
the same on every path
depends on the path, usually on its length
Work around a closed loop
zero
not zero; for friction always negative
Potential energy
exists, with \(\Delta U = -W\)
does not exist
Examples
gravity, the spring force, the electric force of a charge
kinetic friction, air drag, a push from a hand or an engine
ExampleFriction on two routes across a floor

A \(5\,\text{kg}\) crate is dragged across a level floor with \(\mu_k = 0.2\) from a point A to a point B \(6\,\text{m}\) away. Take \(g = 10\,\text{m/s}^2\). Find the work of friction on the straight route, on a detour \(10\,\text{m}\) long, and on a straight round trip to B and back.

Try it on paper first. The solution is one tap away when you are ready.
Intuition

Gravity works like a bank locker: whatever you deposit on the climb, you withdraw in full on the descent. Friction works like a toll road: it charges for every kilometre, in both directions, and never refunds a rupee.

Where the lost energy goes

A puck slides across a table and stops. Its kinetic energy is gone, but nothing was destroyed. The rubbing surfaces warm up slightly. Friction has turned the ordered motion of the puck into the random jiggling of the molecules of the puck and the table. That random motion is heat, or thermal energy. The total energy is unchanged.

We still call it a loss, for a practical reason. The heat is spread over countless molecules moving in all directions. No mechanical process can collect it into the ordered motion of the puck again. The energy is still there, but it can no longer do the job we want.

CheckpointUnanswered

A puck slides across a rough table and stops. It had \(40\,\text{J}\) of kinetic energy. Which statement is right?

Central forces are conservative
Maths you need

Central forces

A central force always points along the line joining the body to a fixed point O, towards O or away from it. Its size depends only on the distance \(r\) from O. The Sun's pull on a planet is a central force. So is the electric force of a fixed charge. So is the pull of a spring tied to a fixed peg on a smooth table.

Every central force is conservative, and the proof needs only one idea. Move the body along an arc of a circle about O. The displacement along the arc is perpendicular to the radius, and the force lies along the radius. So the force does no work on any arc. On a short step straight towards or away from O, the work is \(F(r)\,dr\).

Deriving \(W_{AB} = \int_{r_A}^{r_B} F(r)\,dr\) step 1 of 4
1

\[ d\vec s = dr\,\hat r + r\,d\theta\,\hat\theta \]

Why. any small step splits into a part along the radius and a part along the arc. Here \(\hat r\) points away from O and \(\hat\theta\) along the arc.

A central force on two routesA body moves from A, 1.5 metres from the centre O, to B, 4 metres from O, under a force that always points towards O. One route is a staircase of arcs about O and short radial steps; the other is a smooth curve. On every arc the force is perpendicular to the motion and does no work, so only the radial steps count, and they add up to the same work from 1.5 to 4 metres on any route. F O A B arcs: no work radial steps: all the work
Fig 2.2A force always pointing towards O acts on a body moving from A, \(1.5\,\text{m}\) from O, to B, \(4\,\text{m}\) from O. The violet route is a staircase of arcs and radial steps; the grey route is smooth. The arcs cost nothing, so only the radial steps count, and they cover the same change of radius on every route.

Any path can be approximated by such a staircase of arcs and radial steps, as finely as we like. The arcs contribute nothing. The radial steps add up to \(\int F(r)\,dr\) between the same two radii on every staircase. So the work depends only on the distances of A and B from O. That is the path test, passed. Every central force has a potential energy that depends on \(r\) alone.

CheckpointUnanswered

A planet moves along a short arc of its orbit at a nearly constant distance from the Sun. What work does the Sun's gravity do on it over that arc?

Checkpoint · numericUnanswered

A puck on a smooth table is tied to a fixed peg by a spring of natural length \(0.5\,\text{m}\) and constant \(100\,\text{N/m}\). The puck moves along a winding path from a point \(0.6\,\text{m}\) from the peg to a point \(0.8\,\text{m}\) from the peg. Find the work done by the spring, in joules.

J± 2 %

Return now to the two trekkers. Gravity is conservative, so it does the same work, \(-mg\,\Delta h\), on both trails. The trekker on the long trail is more tired for other reasons. The muscles do non-conservative work on every step, and much of it becomes heat in the body. Gravity charged both of them the same.

Story · James Prescott Joule, 1845
Heating water by falling weights

In the 1840s James Prescott Joule, the son of a brewer near Manchester, let falling weights turn a paddle wheel inside a tank of water. The paddles churned the water, and friction in the water stopped them. Joule measured a tiny rise in the water's temperature. He found that the same loss of potential energy of the weights always gave the same amount of heat. Energy that friction seemed to destroy had become heat, in a fixed exchange. The unit of energy is named after him.

Exam traps
  1. Calling a force conservative because it is constant in size.
    A drag of constant size still does more work on a longer path. Apply the path test or the round-trip test.
  2. Saying friction destroys energy.
    Friction turns mechanical energy into heat. Total energy is conserved.
  3. Taking friction's work over a round trip to be zero.
    Friction opposes the motion on every leg, so its negative works add.