In a power cut, two friends shine two identical torches on the same white wall, so that the two patches of light overlap. The overlap is simply brighter, evenly, all over. There are no bands of brightness and darkness, however carefully the torches are held. Yet the first lesson promised that two waves can add up to darkness.
Path difference and phase difference
The chapters on waves found the rule for two waves that start in step. If one wave travels a distance \(\Delta x\) farther than the other, it arrives behind in its cycle. A wave repeats after one wavelength, and its phase grows by \(2\pi\) over that distance. So a path difference \(\Delta x\) is \(\Delta x/\lambda\) of a cycle, and the phase difference is \(2\pi\Delta x/\lambda\).
For light the distances are tiny. With \(\lambda = 600\,\text{nm}\), a path difference of \(150\,\text{nm}\) is a quarter of a wavelength, and \(\Delta\phi = 2\pi \times 150/600 = \pi/2\). A path difference of \(300\,\text{nm}\) gives \(\pi\), and \(600\,\text{nm}\) gives \(2\pi\). A millionth of a metre of extra path already makes a large change of phase.
Two cases matter most. When the path difference is a whole number of wavelengths, the waves arrive in phase, crest on crest, and the light is brightest. This is constructive interference. When it is an odd number of half wavelengths, the waves arrive in opposite phase, crest on trough. For equal waves the light cancels completely. This is destructive interference.
For two coherent waves that leave their sources in phase:
The dark condition \((2n - 1)\lambda/2\) is the one the NCERT uses, with \(n\) counting the dark places from 1. The chapter on sound wrote the same thing as \((n + \tfrac12)\lambda\) with \(n\) from 0. Both give \(\lambda/2, 3\lambda/2, 5\lambda/2\), and so on. Path differences of \(\lambda/2\), \(\lambda\) and \(3\lambda/2\) therefore give phase differences \(\pi\), \(2\pi\) and \(3\pi\): dark, bright and dark again.
Two coherent sources oscillate in phase and emit light of \(600\,\text{nm}\). A point P is \(5.0\,\mu\text{m}\) from one source and \(6.2\,\mu\text{m}\) from the other. Find the path difference and the phase difference at P. Is P bright or dark?
The path difference is \(\Delta x\) \(= 6.2 - 5.0\) \(= 1.2\,\mu\text{m}\) \(= 1200\,\text{nm}\).
In wavelengths, \(1200/600 = 2\), so \(\Delta x = 2\lambda\) and \(\Delta\phi = 2\pi \times 2 = 4\pi\).
A whole number of wavelengths puts crest on crest, so P is bright.
Two waves of \(600\,\text{nm}\) light leave their sources in phase. At a point their path difference is \(200\,\text{nm}\). What is their phase difference there?
Two coherent waves arrive at a point with a path difference of \(3\lambda/2\). What is the phase difference, and what kind of interference occurs?
Why two torches never make fringes
A bright place needs the waves to arrive in phase, and a dark place needs them half a cycle apart. That pattern stays put only if the phase difference of the two sources stays fixed. Sources whose waves have the same frequency and a phase difference constant in time are coherent sources.
Two sources are coherent if they emit waves of the same frequency whose phase difference does not change with time. Only coherent sources give a steady interference pattern.
The light of a bulb or a torch comes from a huge number of atoms. Each atom sends out a short burst, a wave train that lasts about \(10^{-8}\,\text{s}\) or less. Its phase has nothing to do with the next burst. So the phase of a bulb's light jumps at random a hundred million times a second or faster. A second bulb jumps on its own, quite independently.
Two such sources do make bright and dark bands, but only for an instant. When the phase difference jumps, the bands jump to new places. The eye holds a picture for about a tenth of a second, so it averages about ten million different patterns. The average of all of them is an even brightness. Fig 3.1 shows the two cases side by side.
How, then, can two coherent sources be made? The answer is to take them from one source. If the light of one narrow slit is divided between two slits, any jump of phase at the source reaches both slits together. The two slits then keep a fixed phase difference; this is Young's method, the subject of the next lesson. Splitting one wavefront in this way is called division of wavefront. A thin film splits one wave into two by partial reflection instead, a division of amplitude; the next chapter treats it.
A laser is a far better source. Its atoms are made to emit in step, so a laser's wave train can be many centimetres long, even for a cheap laser pointer. That is why a laser pointer through two slits shows bands at once, while two torches never do.
Two identical sodium lamps light the same patch of a screen. Why are no interference fringes seen?
Which of these pairs are coherent sources?
How bright is a place in between?
At a point on the screen, the electric field of each wave swings up and down as a simple harmonic motion. Write the two as \(y_1 = a_1\sin\omega t\) and \(y_2 = a_2\sin(\omega t + \phi)\). Their sum is again a simple harmonic motion of the same frequency. Its amplitude \(A\) comes from adding the two as arrows, as the chapter on the superposition of oscillations did.
\[ A^2 = a_1^2 + a_2^2 + 2a_1a_2\cos\phi \]
Why. draw \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) as arrows with the angle \(\phi\) between them; the cosine rule gives the length of their sum.
\[ I \propto A^2, \qquad I_1 \propto a_1^2, \qquad I_2 \propto a_2^2 \]
Why. intensity grows as the square of the amplitude, with the same constant for all three.
\[ a_1a_2 \propto \sqrt{I_1 I_2} \]
Why. \(a_1 = \sqrt{I_1}\) and \(a_2 = \sqrt{I_2}\), up to the same constant.
\[ I = I_1 + I_2 + 2\sqrt{I_1 I_2}\cos\phi \]
Read it. multiply step 1 by the constant, term by term.
For two equal waves, \(I_1 = I_2 = I_0\), the formula becomes \(I\) \(= 2I_0(1 + \cos\phi)\) \(= 4I_0\cos^2(\phi/2)\). In phase, \(\phi = 0\), it gives \(4I_0\). At \(\phi = \pi/2\) it gives \(2I_0\), and at \(\phi = \pi\) it gives zero. At \(\phi = 60°\), \(I = 4I_0\cos^2 30° = 3I_0\), and the amplitude is \(2a\cos 30° = \sqrt3\,a\). At \(\phi = 2\pi/3\), \(I = 4I_0\cos^2 60° = I_0\).
Try the sliders of the figure above. With equal waves the curve runs from \(4\) at \(0°\) through \(2\) at \(90°\) to \(0\) at \(180°\). Now make the second wave half as strong. The curve swings only between \(2.25\) and \(0.25\): the dark places are no longer dark. Whatever the amplitudes, the curve is centred on the dashed mean.
Two coherent waves have amplitudes in the ratio \(3 : 4\). Find the ratio of the maximum to the minimum intensity in their interference pattern.
Let the amplitudes be \(a_1 = 3\) and \(a_2 = 4\), in any unit.
In phase the amplitudes add; in opposite phase they subtract. \(I_{\max}/I_{\min}\) \(= (a_1 + a_2)^2/(a_1 - a_2)^2\).
\(I_{\max}/I_{\min}\) \(= (3 + 4)^2/(4 - 3)^2\) \(= 49/1\) \(= 49\).
The brightest places are \(49\) times as bright as the darkest.
The ratio can also be run backwards. Suppose a pattern has \(I_{\max}/I_{\min} = 25\). Then \((a_1 + a_2)/(a_1 - a_2) = 5\), so \(a_1 + a_2 = 5a_1 - 5a_2\), and \(4a_1 = 6a_2\). The amplitudes are in the ratio \(3 : 2\), and the intensities in the ratio \(9 : 4\). In the same way, intensities \(4I_0\) and \(I_0\) have amplitudes in the ratio \(2 : 1\). They give \(I_{\max} = (2 + 1)^2 I_0 = 9I_0\) and \(I_{\min} = (2 - 1)^2 I_0 = I_0\).
Light from two coherent slits reaches a screen with intensities in the ratio \(9 : 1\). What is the ratio \(I_{\max}/I_{\min}\) of the pattern?
Two equal coherent light waves, each of intensity \(I_0\), meet with a phase difference of \(60°\). What is the resultant intensity, as a multiple of \(I_0\)?
Energy is moved, not made
Interference makes some places four times as bright as one wave, and others dark. It does not create or destroy light. Across the pattern the phase difference takes every value equally often, and \(\cos\phi\) averages to zero. So the average intensity is \(\langle I\rangle = I_1 + I_2\), the sum of the two waves alone. The dark places lose exactly what the bright places gain.
Think of the light as sand spread evenly by two sieves. Interference does not add sand. It sweeps the sand from the dark bands into heaps on the bright ones. Measured over a whole number of bands, the heaps hold exactly the sand that was spread.
Two equal coherent waves, each of intensity \(I_0\), make some places of the screen \(4I_0\) bright and others dark. Show that energy is still conserved.
The intensity at a point is \(I = 2I_0 + 2I_0\cos\phi\). Across the pattern the phase difference takes all values from 0 to \(2\pi\) equally, and the average of \(\cos\phi\) over a whole cycle is zero. So the average intensity is \(2I_0\), exactly the sum of the two waves arriving without interference. Energy has only been redistributed, from the dark fringes to the bright ones.
Now return to the two torches. Each torch is a crowd of atoms firing short, independent bursts. At any instant their light does make bright and dark bands on the wall. The phase difference jumps many millions of times a second, and the bands jump with it. The eye averages them into an even patch, of brightness \(I_1 + I_2\). One laser split by two slits keeps a fixed phase difference, so its bands stand still.
- Adding the intensities of two coherent waves.Add the amplitudes with their phase difference, then square: \(I = I_1 + I_2 + 2\sqrt{I_1I_2}\cos\phi\).
- Writing \(I_{\max}/I_{\min} = I_1/I_2\).Take square roots first: \(I_{\max}/I_{\min}\) \(= \bigl((\sqrt{I_1} + \sqrt{I_2})/(\sqrt{I_1} - \sqrt{I_2})\bigr)^2\).
- Using \(\cos\phi\) instead of \(\cos(\phi/2)\) for the amplitude of two equal waves.The amplitude is \(2a\cos(\phi/2)\) and the intensity \(4I_0\cos^2(\phi/2)\); at \(\phi = \pi\) both are zero.
- Thinking that two bulbs do not interfere at all.They interfere at every instant, but their phase difference jumps at random, so the pattern moves too fast to be seen.